Can't find the question or answer you're looking for? Click here to ask your own questions!
The Comprehensive Plan is Osceola County’s official statement of policy regarding future development. Since 1975, Florida law has required every county and city government in the State to adopt and implement a Comprehensive Plan. The Osceola County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopted a Comprehensive Plan, the fifth in the County's history, on December 19, 2005, succeeding the 1991 Comprehensive Plan. The new plan will become effective on July 14, 2008.
Current Florida law requires that local government plans contain several chapters or elements. These elements are:
In addition to these mandatory elements, Osceola County has an Economic Development Element.
The Public Educational Facilities Element will be superseded on or about August 18, 2008 by the Public School Facilities Element (PSFE), a name which is preferred by Florida statute. The principal difference between the PEFE and the PSFE is that the PSFE will contain language relating to concurrency for public schools; it will institute a single countywide Concurrency Service Area (CSA); and it will establish levels of service (LOS) standards for public schools of all types at 110% of FISH (Florida Inventory of School Houses) capacity. For a further discussion of the PSFE, consult the "Schools" section of the FAQs at Osceola.org.
For a discussion of concurrency, see questions #36-38 below.
All elements contain at least two sections—Data & Analysis (D&A), which need not be adopted by ordinance, and Goals, Objectives and Policies (GOPs), which are policy statements that must be adopted by ordinance. Some elements must contain measurements called Levels of Service (LOS) standards. All development proposals (including applications for rezoning and subdivision plats) are reviewed to ensure that these standards are maintained. The CIE must contain a Five Year Schedule of Capital Improvements, keyed to the LOS standards, updated annually. The Future Land Use Element must contain a Future Land Use Map (FLUM) to guide long-term land uses.
Following the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan on December 19, 2005, the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) conducted an interagency review of the Plan. On March 17, 2006, the DCA issued a “Notice of Intent to Find Comprehensive Plan Not in Compliance” with Florida’s growth management laws. After more than one year of negotiations, DCA Secretary Thomas G. Pelham signed a Compliance Agreement (also known as a “settlement agreement”) with Osceola County on November 19, 2007. The Compliance Agreement calls for significant changes to the adopted (December 19, 2005) Comprehensive Plan. The BCC conducted a public hearing on the Compliance Agreement on December 10, 2007 and adopted the Compliance Agreement version of the Comprehensive Plan on that date. To learn more about Compliance Agreements, go to Sec. 163.3184(16), FS. NOTE: There were two challenges to the Compliance Agreement version of the Comprehensive Plan which were filed by "intervenors." Their actions resulted in amendments to four specific policies - two each in the Future Land Use and Conservation Element - Goals, Objectives and Policies. These amendments were accepted by the intervenors and adopted by the Osceola County Board of County Commissioners on April 21, 2008. The Comprehensive Plan will be effective on July 14, 2008.
The most important change is that Osceola County has created a new Mixed Use Future Land Use Map (FLUM) designation which will require a minimum residential density of 5.0 dwelling units per net acre. The Mixed Use areas cover 20.21 square miles (12,934 acre), much of which lie along the east and south shores of Lake Toho and in the vicinity of Narcoossee Road.
Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1.3 defines "net density" as follows:
Net density is defined as the total number of units divided by the developable area. The developable area consists of the residential land area less land for regional, public recreation and open space areas in excess of the County’s minimum requirements, stormwater systems designated by a water management district as “works of the district,” natural water bodies and wetlands.
There are five ways to access the compliance agreement documents:
We regret that we cannot email the entire set of Comprehensive Plan documents to you. The files are very large, and they won’t make it through firewalls.
Jeff Jones, the Countys Smart Growth Coordinator, can be reached at 407-742-2395 or via email at jjon3@osceola.org.
The two plans are very different in philosophy.
SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN 1991 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THE COMPLIANCE AGREEMENT VERSION:
| 1991 Old Comprehensive Plan | 2007 New Compliance Version |
|---|---|
|
No Urban Growth Boundary |
Contains Urban Growth Boundary |
|
No minimum densities for new development in urban areas |
Infill Area-minimum densities of 3.0 dwelling units per net acre. |
|
No criteria for increasing densities and intensities within the Urban Area |
Establishes locational criteria to allow for higher densities and intensities of use |
|
Few policies for the protection of agricultural land and open space |
Establishment of Rural Land Stewardship which allows planned development and conservation of large tracts of rural lands |
The FLUM is a part of the Future Land Use Element of the Osceola County Comprehensive Plan that portrays planned land use patterns at a specific time in the future—in our case, the year 2025. In Florida, every county and every municipality must have a FLUM, and it must be adopted by ordinance. The Zoning Map, which depicts zoning districts and the land uses that may be permitted on any specific parcel of land, is not a part of the Comprehensive Plan—it is a part of the County’s Land Development Code. To view the FLUM series three maps in all, click on the following links:
In Florida, it’s the Zoning Map that must be consistent with the Future Land Use Map, and not the other way around.
Osceola County will be amending the Land Development Code (LDC), which includes zoning regulations. For many property owners, these amendments should have the effect of increasing their allowable densities and intensities of use. If the amendments to the LDC do not achieve the desired effect, property owners may apply for a rezoning. As a general rule, the County does not initiate rezonings.
The UGB is a perimeter that separates urban uses the Urban Growth Area from rural and conservation uses. Similar methods have been used for many decades by the cities of Lexington, Kentucky and Portland, Oregon. Osceola County’s previous comprehensive plans have contained urban service area concepts, but the UGB is new to the Osceola County Comprehensive Plan. To view the UGB click the following link:
Yes, as early as May 1, 2015 and approximately once every seven years after that. Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1.7 provides the following rule for amending the UGB:
The size of the UGB and its continuing capacity to accommodate the projected population shall be evaluated during each statutorily required Evaluation and Appraisal Report EAR period. If determined that the amount of land available for development is insufficient to allow the UGB to function as desired, adjustment to the boundary may be made through the County’s EAR amendment process. An adjustment to the UGB shall not be approved unless recommended in the EAR and adopted as an EAR amendment.
The next Evaluation and Appraisal Report EAR was forwarded to the Florida Department of Community Affairs DCA in a proposed form on March 24, 2008; it will be scheduled for adoption on June 23, 2008. UGB amendments will not be considered at that time. The next opportunity will be in 2015.
For more information about the Evaluation and Appraisal Report, see Questions 1.43 through 1.46.
Densities in the Urban Infill Area will be 3.0 to 18.0 dwelling units per acre. See FLUE Policies 1.3.8, 1.3.9, and 1.3.10. Densities in the Expansion Area which coincides with the “Mixed Use” FLUM designation will range from 5.0 to 25.0 dwelling units per acre. See FLUE Policy 1.3.11. To view the Goals, Objectives, and Policies section of the adopted Comprehensive plan, click the following link:
The Urban Infill Area and the Urban Expansion Area both lie within the Urban Growth Boundary. The difference is that urban and suburban land use patterns are already well established within the Urban Infill Area. The Urban Expansion (Mixed Use) Area is largely undeveloped and has relatively few residents at this time, allowing for compact, pedestrian-friendly forms of mixed use development that integrate residential land uses with commercial and institutional uses. Osceola County will continue to regulate land uses within the Urban Infill Area to maintain existing patterns, although at a somewhat higher density in the case of agricultural lands and some low density residential properties. Within the Urban Expansion Area, development will be consistent with the Conceptual Master Plans required by Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1.10.
There will be few changes outside the UGB, except in the Rural Land Stewardship Areas, if and when they are designated. Allowable densities will remain low—a maximum of one dwelling unit per five acres, except in Rural Settlements, where densities of two units per acre are permitted. (See FLUE Policies 1.3.3 regarding densities in the Rural Agriculture FLUM category; see Policies 1.3.4 and 1.3.5 regarding Rural Settlements.
No. See FLUE Policies 1.3.6 and 1.3.7 for more information regarding Rural Enclaves and the manner in which they may be redesignated for higher densities.
Yes. In fact, the Future Land Use Element anticipates that commercial and office uses will be a part of all development projects within the Mixed Use FLUM category. FLUE Policy 1.3.13 creates a hierarchy of non-residential centers - Neighborhood, Community, Urban, and Employment - and prescribes locational criteria for each. Policy 1.3.15 contains guidelines for the mixture of uses within the Mixed Use districts as a whole. Policy 1.1.9 contains guidelines for the mixture of use in each of the nine districts.
Yes, according to Future Land Use Element Policy 1.1.3, which defines "net density", the following land uses will not be counted toward the minimum density - natural waterbodies, wetlands, regional parks and open space, and regional stormwater systems.
The true and correct copy can be found at the Clerk of the Board’s office on the Fourth Floor of the County Administration Building. The Planning Office will maintain a CD version for the convenience of staff and the public.
Written requests for information will be forwarded to Jeff Jones. They will forward their written interpretations with cc’s to each other to the Division Administrator or his designee for review before releasing to the public. For the sake of consistency, we will maintain a master file of all interpretations. If appropriate, the interpretations will be incorporated into the FAQs.
If the existing zoning is inconsistent with the FLUM or with other components of the Comprehensive Plan, the applicant cannot proceed until the inconsistency is remedied, typically through a FLUM amendment.
Yes. The Compliance version of the Comprehensive Plan allows a high level of flexibility to the owner of commercial property, with ultimate intensities closely linked to locational criteria. Amendments to the FLUM are not required if the property meets those criteria.
Every development within a Mixed Use district must meet the minimum density requirement, unless the development is subject to a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) or Development of County Impact (DCI) development order. In those cases, County staff will see that the development order is sufficiently rigorous to assure that the minimum requirements are scrupulously adhered to.
Concurrency is one of the core doctrines of Florida’s 1985 Growth Management Act. It means that new land developments are responsible for the capital costs of infrastructure and services, as defined in the LOS within the elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and that local governments must withhold development orders if new infrastructure (e.g. roads, water and sewer service, solid waste, and parks) is not provided concurrent with the development.
Effective in 2008, with the adoption of the Public School Facilities element and its implementing ordinances, public schools will also be subject to the concurrency requirement.
Florida law allows concurrency to be applied in different ways, depending on the type of infrastructure or service. For example, roadways may fall below the adopted LOS, provided the local government’s Capital Improvement Element (CIE) commits to sufficient financially feasible funding within three years.
The Transportation Office Aaron Michelson will answer questions regarding roadway concurrency. Questions concerning public schools concurrency should be addressed to Wayne Bennett at 407-742-0200. Questions concerning other types of concurrency should be directed to Steve Josephson in the Planning Office.
The Planning and Zoning Office is taking an informal approach to FLUM compliance letters. Email the Office or send a letter to Don Fisher, Deputy Administrator (see question 1.30 above), and request a compliance letter. Be sure to include the property’s address and tax ID number.
Staff will, provided the applicant has concurrently filed for the appropriate FLUM/FLUE amendment. In practice, staff does not anticipate a large amount of FLUM/FLUE amendment applications. They will be very rare outside the UGB and not necessary inside the Mixed Use area.
The EAR is a comprehensive policy audit of a local government’s existing Comprehensive Plan. Usually, an EAR is the first step toward the revision of a Comprehensive Plan, as was the case of the 1998 EAR, which led to the revision and eventually adoption of the new Comprehensive Plan on December 10, 2007.
No, the statutory due date for the adoption of a new EAR was March 1, 2008. The Florida Department of Community Affairs asked Osceola County to complete the EAR as soon after the due date as possible.
The Planning Commission conducted a hearing on the proposed EAR on March 20, 2008. On March 24, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners voted to provide the proposed EAR to the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for interagency review. Comments from DCA, state and regional agencies, and neighboring jurisdictions will be returned to Osceola County and incorporated into the final version. The Board of County Commissioners conducted an adoption hearing on June 23, 2008, and unanimously adopted the revised version, which was forwarded to DCA for approval.
It would be a violation of the Comprehensive Plan for the BCC to approve a Development Order (DO) for a density lower (or higher) than that allowed by ECFRPC rules. Osceola County would be subject to legal sanctions which could be initiated by "any affected person."
This matter will be addressed when Osceola County adopts new land development regulations to implement the Comprehensive Plan. In the meanwhile, Osceola County will continue to process applications for lot splits, which will be evaluated for consistency with the Comprehensive Plan.
The new Comprehensive Plan has some major changes in the regulation of wetlands. See Policies 1.4.5 through 1.4.16 of the Conservation Element. Policy 1.4.8 establishes three categories of wetlands consistent with the State’s Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM). Policy 1.4.10 requires an Ecological Evaluation (EE) for sites proposed for development. Policy 1.4.11 states when wetland protections will apply within the three categories. Policy 1.4.12 requires setbacks in from the three categories.
The purpose of transferable development rights in Osceola County will be to preserve open space and to provide incentives for development on an urban scale. A credit will be equal to one dwelling unit. Persons who wish to develop properties within the UGB at a density lower than the allowable minimum (3 units per net acre in the Infill Area; 5 units per acre in the Expansion Area) could purchase the number of credits based upon the number of units they don't want to build. The per-unit cost of the credit would be determined by the density of the land from which the credits would be purchased. The Comprehensive Plan allows a maximum density of 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres in rural areas. Therefore, to reduce by 100 the number of allowable units for a project inside the UGB, it would be necessary to purchase development rights for 100 units (i. e. covering at least 500 acres) on land outside the UGB.
The Comprehensive Plan does not require that all development within the Mixed Use FLUM district be approved via a PD, but Osceola County anticipates that most developments will be handled in this manner. The Mixed Use FLUM category was created to encourage a mixture of land uses and the PD is the best instrument available for approving more than one land use on a site.
At this time, Osceola County does not plan to initiate a mass rezoning to bring private lands into conformance with the new FLUM. Staff intends to implement the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, including densities and intensities of use, through amendments to the Land Development Code.
Applications are available from the Planning and Zoning Office, Suite 1400, of the County Administration Building. You will need a copy of the property deed, the parcel ID number, and, if you are not the owner, a signed letter of authorization from the owner. You do not need a survey of the property to apply. You will need to remit fees at the time of application submittal. Amendment applications are $3,710.45 plus $7.50 per acre and are non-refundable. Checks should be made payable to the Osceola County Board of County Commissioners.
All amendments are subject to the regular public hearing process. County staff review the applications and provide a recommendation the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. Applicants and other interested parties have the opportunity to address these items at the public hearings. After review by the board, amendments are forwarded to the Florida Department of Community Affairs for final review. For large scale amendments (over 10 acres), this may then require extensive analysis by the applicant to address issues of concern to the Planning and Zoning Office.
Applications for small scale amendments are accepted anytime, but typically are scheduled for public hearings in two week intervals. A schedule of these deadlines is available from the Planning and Zoning Office or in the detailed description of the Requirements, Calendar, and Process for Comprehensive Plan Amendments.
Large scale amendments are only accepted twice a year, as mandated by Florida statute.
A detailed description of the Requirements, Calendar, and Process for Comprehensive Plan Amendments can be obtained from the Planning and Zoning Office.
Applications for Concurrency Review are required with almost every parent application Rezoning, Conditional Use, CDP, Preliminary and Final Subdivision, DRI, PD Amendments, etc.... Applications can be obtained from the Building and Development Department, located on the first floor of the County Administration Building. Applicants may request that a copy of the CMS application be sent to them via e-mail by contacting the Concurrency Manager at 407-742-0200.
You may also need additional permits and / or approvals from the Building, Code Enforcement, Engineering, Planning, and Zoning Offices.
Safe Development Lines are lines of elevation along a lake. This line indicates building setbacks. Non-water dependent structures are prohibited from being built or placed lakeward of the Safe Development Line. Septic systems must be 150ft landward of the Safe Development Line. Safe Development Lines are observed on the following lakes in Osceola County:
The elevation of the Safe Development Line varies by lake. Please check with your surveyor or the Planning and Environmental Services Department for the correct elevation.
NOTE: Any property that was platted prior to the adoption of the Osceola County Comprehensive Plan on April 22, 1991 may be exempt from this provision.
First, determine the parcel ID number for your property. This is located at the top of your tax bill and begins with an "R". If you dont have your bill, call the County Property Appraisers office at 407-742-5000 and ask them to look it up. Next, call or visit the County Planning and Zoning Offices to determine if your property has the appropriate zoning and land use designations to accommodate the proposed division. The proposed lots must comply with the Osceola County Comprehensive Plan, Subdivision Regulations, and the minimum development standards of your zoning district.
Applications are available from the Building Office, in the County Administration Building. You can also download an application in PDF format from the Documents section of this site. Simply print it out on your home PC, fill in all of the appropriate fields, and return it to the Building Office.
The PSFE has not been adopted yet. On March 10, 2008, the Board of County Commissioners authorized the transmittal of the draft PSFE, along with related changes to the County’s Intergovernmental Coordination Element (ICE) and Capital Improvement Element (CIE), for interagency review headed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA).
The PSFE and related amendments were received by the DCA on March 21, 2008. DCA then has five days to determine whether the package is complete. The review agencies have 30 days to review and provide comments to DCA. Within 60 days of the determination of completeness, DCA packages and mails the letter of Objections, Recommendations, and Comments (ORC) to the local government. The deadline for receipt of the ORC is therefore May 20, 2008.
The Data & Analysis (D&A) section is completely different—the PSFE contains new data throughout. The existing PEFE, which was a part of the Osceola County Comprehensive Plan that was adopted in 2005, does not contain Levels of Service (LOS) standards; the PSFE now under consideration contains LOS of 110% of FISH (Florida Inventory of School Houses) for all types of schools for the next five years and thereafter. The PEFE was an optional element—local governments were not required to adopt one, but they were binding if adopted. Finally, the PSFE addresses the challenges of concurrency as mandated by the Florida Legislature (Sec. 163.3180, Florida Statutes).
Because it is required by Florida law. Florida’s 1985 Growth Management Act did not mandate the inclusion of educational facilities as a part of local government comprehensive plans. In 2005, the Legislature mandated that local governments (county as well as municipal) adopt a Public School Facilities Element.
The LOS for all school types—including elementary, middle, high, and magnet schools, as well as schools of choice— is 110% of FISH (Florida Inventory of School Houses). FISH is an inventory of student stations maintained by the Florida Department of Education.
Yes. The draft version of the PSFE was forwarded to DCA by Osceola County staff on August 30, 2007. DCA responded with generally favorable comments on September 21, 2007. The version transmitted by the Board of County Commissioners on March 10, 2008 reflects those comments.
The draft which was forwarded to DCA on August 30, 2007 did not contain LOS standards because at the time we did not know what they would be. (The School Board has since identified the 110% standard which was incorporated into the transmitted version.) The issue of whether CSAs should be countywide or less-than-countywide had not been resolved as of August 30, 2007, so the earlier version did not identify the countywide approach as it appears in the transmitted version.
The Kissimmee City Commission and the St. Cloud City Council transmitted their versions of the PSFE to DCA on March 6 and February 21, 2008, respectively. The three elements adopted by the local governments are substantially the same, although the two municipalities made adjustments to their versions to fit local needs. They are not in conflict.
In 2002, the Florida Legislature required School Boards to enter into ILA with the county and municipal governments within their jurisdictions. In 2003, the governing bodies of the School District, Osceola County, and the Cities of Kissimmee and St. Cloud adopted an ILA to guide the planning process for new schools. Among other features, the 2003 ILA called for the creation of a Technical Working Group (TWG) composed of staff of the four local governments, and it called for an annual summit of elected officials to address school planning issues.
Concurrency is one of the core doctrines of Florida’s 1985 Growth Management Act. It means that new land developments are responsible for the capital costs of infrastructure and services, as defined in the LOS within the elements of the Comprehensive Plan, and that local governments must withhold development orders if new infrastructure (e.g. roads, water and sewer service, solid waste, and parks) is not provided concurrent with the development.
Eventually, yes. The 2005 legislation requires that county governments create at least two Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs) no later than five years after the adoption of the ILA. During the first five years, less-than-countywide CSAs may be adopted, but they are not mandatory.
No. The PSFE and ILA call for countywide CSAs for the first five years, although the School Board may propose to amend the ILA to create less-than-countywide CSAs at an earlier time. This will require the approval of the other governing bodies.
The developer could agree to halt development when 110% of FISH capacity is reached. The developer could agree to phase the project so that development would cease at 110% and resume when additional school capacity is available. Or the developer could seek a proportionate share agreement to “up front” the development’s share of impact fees in the form of cash or land for a school site.
Yes. School Board staff, along with the staffs of the cities of Kissimmee and St. Cloud, participated at two levels—planning staff participated through the TWG to prepare the original draft and the School Board’s attorney worked with the County and City Attorneys to finish the final draft of the ILA. The local governing bodies—the Osceola County Board of County Commissioners, the Kissimmee City Commission, the St. Cloud City Council, and the Osceola County School Board—have the final say.
They say some of the same things. For instance, they both commit to a LOS that is 110% of FISH capacity for all schools. The PSFE ideally takes a broader view of school planning than the more detail-oriented ILA which implements the PSFE’s Goals, Objectives and Policies. There are significant differences among the local government PSFEs, but the ILA is identical for all four bodies.
Not able to find the information you're looking for somewhere on our site? Check out our Frequently Asked Questions listing for answers to queries we commonly receive.